The Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 is a reformative
legislation which was enacted to reform convicts. There is one aspect of its
applicability and that is this Act does not apply to the Statutes which are
enacted later than this Act and mentions the minimum punishment.
The Supreme Court in the case of Superintendent,
Central Excise v. Bahubali[i] held
that “where there is a statute which bars the exercise of judicial
discretion in matter of award of sentence, the Probation of Offenders Act will
have no application or relevance.”
Later, the Supreme Court while giving more clarification on
this issue held in the case of State through S.P., New Delhi v. Ratan
Lal Arora[ii] that
“ in cases where a specific enactment, enacted after the Probation Act
prescribes a minimum sentence of imprisonment, the provisions of Probation Act
cannot be invoked if the special Act contains any provision to enforce the same
without reference to any other Act containing a provision, in derogation of the
special enactment, there is no scope for extending the benefit of Probation Act
to the accused”.
In the case of Ratan Lal[iii], the
accused was convicted of the charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Later, the High Court released him on probation on account of his good conduct.
This was challenged. The Supreme Court stated that the judiciary cannot award
the less punishment then prescribed in the Statute. This is a limit on judicial
discretion. The benefit of the Probation Act cannot be extended to the accused
because Section 28 of the Prevention of Corruption Act states that the
provisions of this Act are in addition to and not in derogation of any other
law for the time being in force.
Recently, the Calcutta High Court held that the Probation Act does not apply to the POCSO Act, 2012[iv]
In Conclusion, the Probation Act is not applicable in cases
of Special Acts if the special enactment does not have a provision which
mentions the derogation of special enactment.
[i] AIR 1979 SC 1271.
[ii] (2004) 4 SCC 590.
[iii] Ibid.
[iv] Prakash Shaw v. State of
West Bengal, C.R.A. 69 of 2018.
Comments
Post a Comment